Whether or not sex addiction is a made up disorder is something I’ve had to confront many times. When my therapist first mentioned it to me, I did some quick research and I was skeptical myself. Well, nearly a year later and I believe there’s something to it.
Now, there are interesting articles to be read that attempt to surface the different sides of the controversy. MSNBC online has an interesting discussion – one of the first I found on the subject. The basic outline of the controversy is that some view the use of addiction beyond physical dependency (chemical dependency resulting in withdrawel symptoms when stoped) stretches the concept too far. There is a recognition, however, that there is a psychological component to addiction such that combatting the chemical dependancy alone is typcially inadequate to successfully maintain drug or alcohol sobriety.
Another branch of the debate essentially asserts that addiction isn’t the correct appelation and that the problematic sexual behaviors described are really manifestations of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD). When most people think of OCD, they think of a character like USA’s “defective detective” in the television series Monk. Monk has a pathologically strong obsession with cleanliness and order. Or others might think of those who excessively wash their hands or lock doors, etc. The argument that sex addiction is a form of OCD is an important distinction (e.g, not purely “academic”). OCD is an anxiety disorder manifesting in recurrent, persistent, intrusive thoughts and related conpulsions (rituals). In this light, sex is a compulsion (behavior a person feels driven to in order to reduce distress). Treatment for OCD – Behavior therapy and medication used more in OCD treatment - may then be more effectively applied to sexual “compulsion.”
The last group thinks sex addiction is just more psychobabble. That the label of addiction tries to create a disease when none really exists. Those who suffer then are simply weak willed, promiscuous (low morals) or bad decison makers (stupid). (I might overstate just a bit in parantheses). The worry is that a diagnosis of addiction might provide an excuse for bad decision making or simple bad behavior. Well, that’s true for anything. I can use alcoholism, drug addiction, being male, being bald, rich or poor all as excuses for bad behavior. That misses the point. I don’t want a pass for my bad behavior. It is important for my recovery to be held accountable for it.
Well, this is an interesting discussion for me. But, I think the argument boils down to two basic questions. The first of which interests me, but only intellectually. But, I only really care about the second question.
Does Sex Addiction have any scientific usefulness? In other words, does expanding the addiction taxonomy help us understand human behavior and pathology? Science seeks to describe, understand and – ultimately – explain the world. So, there are important scientific questions about whether the brain of sex addicts have a unusually high release of Dopamine (so called, “Dopamine Dump”) in their brains when engaged in these activities; whether sex addicts experience obssesive, intrusive thoughts and compulsive behaviors that they find difficult to control; etc. It is all very interesting, but no where near my primary concern.
Does the Sex Addiction concept have any therapeutic usefulness? Now, here’s the meat of the coconut for me. Although the scientific understanding feeds treatment modalities, I care most about effective therapy. This is what I know for sure – I have been engaged in behavior that I despareately want to stop. I haven’t been able to stop. Continuing to engage in that behavior is destroying my marriage, interfering with my work, and separating me from friends and family. I CAN’T DO IT ON MY OWN! At least, I haven’t so far. So, call me weak willed or “Monk” or an addict. I DON’T CARE. You can call me whatever you want if you can help me.
I do want to understand as much as I can about why I have done what I have done, in service of making different choices – behaving differently. If understanding addiction, as a general dynamic, and sexual addiction, more specifically, helps drive that understanding, then it is all good. Equally important is if understanding these behaviors as an addiction helps professionals and others (such as SAA or SLAA) help people like me, then let’s stop arguing about the wrong thing and go help save lives and relationships.
Links:
Mayo Clinic info on Sex Addiction
Health.live.com search on Sex Addiction
Hi, I am very intrigued with your blog.
I have recently journeyed through hell with my ex. He was/is a sex addict. He brought me into his world for a while, when I found out about a couple of other women he was seeing. My story is very long and involved…
But I am a love addict. I am in love with a sex addict. I am seeking recovery through a 12-step program & while that is helpful, like you, I find that a creative outlet is most healing for me.
I wish you well & will be back to read your unfolding story…
Smiles!
-BizyLizy
Hey, thanks for your interest in my recovery. I really appreciate your well wishes.
I am saddened by many things about this addiction. I am particularly saddened by reflecting on the many people I’ve hurt, especially my wife.
I am heartened by the fact that there is hope. Hope for recovery, hope for healing.
Be well.
-Blues1940
Hey Blues…
Stopping by to invite you over. I consider your story a part of my collection.
Blessings.
There is certainly hope in this struggle. Your recovery and strategy to remain pure must be as dynamic and creative as the addiction itself. I suggest finding a purity group through a local church. Finding others who are willing to fight against the addiction can be very beneficial in many ways.
I think a purity group in a local church may be extremely effective for some and not for others. Having a diversity of approaches to support, some based in religion and others not, is critical I believe to helping as many people as possible. It is critically important that people struggling with this addiction try out different groups and experiment a bit with going outside their comfort zone in terms who they might normally interact with (e.g., a non-chirstian going to a christian group or a someone suspicious of therapy going to a counseling group, etc.). All this in the service of finding the suite of support activities that is most helpful to them. That is going to be really unique for each person.
I agree blues1940. Being outside your comfort zone can be very helpful.